The election is the filing, which is the part most people get wrong. Treasury Regulation 20.2010-2(a)(2) provides that upon the timely filing of a complete and properly prepared estate tax return, an executor "will have elected portability" unless the executor affirmatively chooses not to. There is no separate election form and no election box to check in order to elect. Paragraph (a)(3)(i) supplies the mirror image: to not elect, the executor must state so affirmatively on the return or in an attachment, in the manner the Form 706 instructions set out. Paragraph (a)(3)(ii) adds the other way to fail to elect, which is simply not filing.
An electing estate is treated as required to file, and that has a consequence. Under paragraph (a)(1), an estate that elects portability "will be considered ... to be required to file a return under section 6018(a)." The due date is therefore nine months after the date of death, or the end of an extension actually obtained. The same paragraph then closes a door and opens another: the discretionary extension relief in Treasury Regulation 301.9100-3 "will not be granted" to an estate that was independently required to file under section 6018(a), but it "may be available" to an estate that was not. In other words, the estates that can be rescued from a missed election are precisely the small ones that never had to file in the first place, and Revenue Procedure 2022-32 gives those estates a simplified route on or before the fifth anniversary of the death.
It is changeable right up to the deadline, and then it is not. Paragraph (a)(4) lets an executor who timely files "make or may supersede a portability election previously made," provided the superseding return is filed on or before the due date including extensions actually granted. Once that date passes, the election as it then stands "becomes irrevocable."
Who may make it is broader than people assume. Paragraph (a)(6)(i) covers an appointed executor. Paragraph (a)(6)(ii) covers the situation where nobody has been appointed at all, which is common when a small estate passes entirely by beneficiary designation and joint title: any person "in actual or constructive possession of any property of the decedent," a non-appointed executor, may file the return and elect. An appointed executor can later supersede that person's election within the deadline; one non-appointed executor generally cannot override another's.
Two eligibility limits sit in paragraph (a)(5). The election is available only for deaths on or after January 1, 2011, and it is not available at all for a decedent who was a nonresident and not a United States citizen at death. For that decedent, filing a return does not constitute an election.
A return filed only to elect does not need full valuations of everything. This is the provision that makes the exercise affordable, and it is easy to miss. Paragraph (a)(7)(ii)(A) says that for an estate not otherwise required to file, property whose value is deductible under the marital or charitable deduction need not be reported at a value; the executor reports the description, ownership and beneficiary, together with what is needed to establish the deduction. Paragraph (a)(7)(ii)(B) attaches the condition: the executor must exercise "due diligence to estimate the fair market value of the gross estate," and reports a good-faith estimate. The relief switches off in four listed situations, including where the value affects what passes to someone else, where it is needed for another Code provision, where only part of an interest is marital or charitable deduction property, and where a partial disclaimer or partial QTIP election has been made.
The return stays open longer than a normal return. Section 2010(c)(5)(B) provides that notwithstanding the period of limitation in section 6501, after the ordinary assessment period has run, "the Secretary may examine a return of the deceased spouse to make determinations with respect to" the transferred amount. So the IRS can revisit the deceased spouse's return years later to verify the figure the survivor is using, even though it can no longer assess additional tax on that return itself. That is a reason to keep the first spouse's return and its supporting records, indefinitely.
One limit worth stating because it is the commonest false assumption: portability is an estate tax mechanism only. The generation-skipping transfer tax exemption is not portable, and a first spouse's unused GST exemption is lost rather than transferred.