"Regulatory Halt" is an umbrella with five species inside it. The equities exchanges harmonized their halt rules around a standardized definition adopted through amendments to the national market system plans, and an SEC filing notice sets out the result: under the common rules, "a Regulatory Halt means one of five types of halts: (a) a halt in trading a security called by the Primary Listing Market for regulatory purposes (such as dissemination of material news); (b) a trading pause triggered by Limit Up Limit Down; (c) a halt based on Extraordinary Market Activity; (d) a SIP Halt; or (e) a halt triggered by a Market-Wide Circuit Breaker." Two of those five, the market-wide circuit breaker and the limit up-limit down pause, are what most people mean when they say "circuit breaker", and they have their own page with their own thresholds. The other three are ordinary parts of the machinery that rarely get named in consumer writing.
The regulatory purposes are stated openly and not exhaustively. The same filing defines a Regulatory Halt as one "declared by the Primary Listing Market in trading in one or more securities on all Trading Centers for regulatory purposes, including for the dissemination of material news, news pending, suspensions, or where otherwise necessary to maintain a fair and orderly market." The word "including" is doing real work there. Material news and news pending are the familiar cases, but the definition leaves the listing market room to act where a fair and orderly market requires it, and a list of reasons drawn from that sentence is a list of examples rather than the boundary of the power.
A Regulatory Halt and an Operational Halt are not the same event. The contrast is the sharpest practical distinction on this subject. An "Operational Halt" is defined as "a halt in trading in one or more securities only on the market declaring the halt; it is not a Regulatory Halt, and other markets are not required to halt trading in the impacted securities." So a venue with a technical problem can stop trading on itself while the security keeps trading elsewhere, and a holder watching only that venue's screen would wrongly conclude the security had stopped. A Regulatory Halt is the one that reaches every trading center.
The listing market starts it and ends it. FINRA Rule 6120(b)(1) makes the start time "when the Primary Listing Market declares the Regulatory Halt, regardless of whether an issue with communications impacts the dissemination of the notice", and provides that, unless FINRA's extraordinary-market-volatility rule specifies otherwise, trading "shall resume upon notice from the Primary Listing Market that the Regulatory Halt has been terminated or at the SIP Halt Resume Time specified in such notice". That opening qualifier is what carves out the market-wide circuit breaker, whose durations are fixed in a rule of their own. A halt therefore has no fixed length. It runs until the listing market says otherwise, which is why a news halt can last minutes or most of a session depending on how long the issuer takes to publish and the market takes to absorb what was published.
FINRA has its own halt power, and it takes two conditions rather than one. Under Rule 6120(a)(2), FINRA must halt off-exchange trading in an NMS stock where extraordinary market activity is occurring "that has a severe and continuing negative impact, on a market-wide basis, on quoting, order, or trading activity or on the availability of market information necessary to maintain a fair and orderly market" and where FINRA determines that the activity is caused by the disruption or malfunction of an electronic quotation, communication, reporting or execution system. Both limbs must be satisfied, and the second has two routes of its own: FINRA may make that determination directly where the failing system is operated by or linked to FINRA or one of its members, but where the failing system belongs to an exchange or one of its members, the rule requires FINRA to consult that exchange first. The rule then says what counts as a severe and continuing negative impact, listing "a series of quotes, orders, or transactions at prices substantially unrelated to the current market", "duplicative or erroneous quoting, order, trade reporting, or other related message traffic", and "the unavailability of quoting, order, transaction information, or regulatory messages for a sustained period".
The off-exchange prohibition has one carve-out, and it is in the sentence after the one people quote. Rule 5260(a) closes with a qualification: where FINRA closes its own facility under Rule 6120(a)(3), rather than halting a security, "members would not be prohibited from trading through other markets for which trading is not halted." That is a facility closure, not a halt in the security, so the two are answering different questions. Rule 5260 also reaches derivatives on halted securities: under 5260(b) the same prohibition applies to a future on a single security whose underlying security is halted, and to a future on a narrow-based securities index where the halted constituents make up 50 percent or more of the index's market capitalization.
An SEC trading suspension is a different instrument. Section 12(k)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act, at 15 U.S.C. 78l(k)(1), gives the SEC power by order, where the public interest and the protection of investors so require, "summarily to suspend trading in any security (other than an exempted security) for a period not exceeding 10 business days", and separately "summarily to suspend all trading on any national securities exchange or otherwise, in securities other than exempted securities, for a period not exceeding 90 calendar days". The second of those requires the President to be notified and not to disapprove. Neither is a listing-market halt: the order comes from the regulator, the ten-business-day version is the one investors occasionally meet in practice, and it is typically used where the reliability of public information about a company is in question rather than because of a price move.
Whether your resting order survives is a venue-by-venue question. When the exchanges filed their harmonized halt rules they did not harmonize this. Some proposed to cancel all outstanding orders in the affected securities when a halt is declared; others proposed to halt the securities but leave every resting order in place; others proposed to cancel some and retain others. So an investor with a resting limit order cannot assume it is still there when trading resumes, and the answer is in the rules of whichever venue held the order rather than in any general rule.