Start with the codification trap, because reading the current statute carelessly produces the wrong answer. Section 164(b)(6) is still headed "Limitation on individual deductions for taxable years 2018 through 2025", while its operative text applies to "a taxable year beginning after December 31, 2017" with no end date, and the schedule in (b)(7) runs through 2029. The heading was simply never conformed when Congress extended the rule. A reader who trusts the heading concludes the cap has expired.
The cap amount is on a statutory schedule rather than an inflation index, which matters because it moves every single year without any Revenue Procedure announcing it. Section 164(b)(7)(A) sets $40,400 for 2026, then 101% of the prior year's figure for 2027 through 2029, then $10,000 for any year beginning after 2029. A married person filing separately gets half of the figure that would otherwise apply.
The phasedown is the part that surprises people. Once modified adjusted gross income passes the threshold, section 164(b)(7)(B) reduces the cap by 30% of the excess, and clause (iii) stops the reduction once the cap has fallen to $10,000. Modified adjusted gross income here means adjusted gross income increased by amounts excluded under sections 911, 931 or 933, which is a narrow definition specific to this provision. Inside the phasedown band, an extra $1,000 of income both adds $1,000 to income and removes $300 of deduction, so $1,300 of income is exposed to tax for every $1,000 earned. That is a real and temporary spike in the marginal cost of income, and it ends once the cap has bottomed out.
Now the exception that a drafter almost always states too broadly. The flush text of section 164(b)(6) switches the cap off for foreign taxes described in subsection (a)(3) and for taxes described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a) that are paid or accrued in carrying on a trade or business or a section 212 activity. Paragraphs (1) and (2) are real property taxes and personal property taxes. Income taxes are paragraph (3), and (a)(3) appears in the exception only for foreign taxes. So property taxes on a rental or a business property are uncapped and go on Schedule E or Schedule C, while an individual's state income tax stays capped even when every dollar of that income came from the business.
That asymmetry is why the pass-through entity tax exists. Many states now let a partnership or S corporation elect to pay state income tax at the entity level, with a corresponding credit or exclusion for the owners. IRS Notice 2020-75 announced that Treasury and the IRS intend to issue proposed regulations confirming that such a payment is deductible by the entity in computing its non-separately stated income, and is not taken into account by the owner in applying the SALT cap, and said taxpayers may rely on the notice in the meantime. Whether an election is available, and whether it helps, is a state-by-state question worth putting to a tax preparer who knows the state.
Two smaller rules catch people out. Section 164(c)(1) denies a deduction for taxes assessed against local benefits that tend to increase the value of the property assessed, such as a sidewalk or sewer assessment, except for the part properly allocable to maintenance or interest. And prepaying a property tax does not accelerate the deduction unless the tax has actually been assessed: the IRS said so directly in December 2017 (IR-2017-210), adding that state or local law decides when a tax is assessed, which is generally when the taxpayer becomes liable for it.