The gap between trade date and settlement date is not a technicality; it is what a cash account's rules against spending unsettled money are actually about. An investor who buys and sells a security before paying for the purchase with already-settled funds is, in the SEC's terms, "freeriding," a practice not permitted under Regulation T. If it happens, the broker may be required to restrict the account so that, for 90 days afterward, the investor can only buy securities to the extent they already have settled cash on hand, rather than relying on proceeds from a sale that has not yet settled. Major brokerage firms describe a related, narrower version of this restriction, commonly called a good faith violation, that arises when unsettled funds are used to make a purchase that is then sold before the funds used for it have settled; three such violations within 12 months trigger a similar 90-day restriction. This page states that convention on the strength of major custodians' own investor education rather than a rule the SEC's bulletin itself names in those exact words.
Settlement, not the trade itself, is what determines who is actually on the register when a company checks who is owed a dividend. A company sets a record date, the day it checks its ownership records, and the exchange fixes an ex-dividend date from it so that a purchase completed before that date has time to settle and put the buyer on the register in time. Under the current one-business-day cycle, the ex-dividend date now usually falls on the same day as the record date, rather than a day before it as it did under the older two-day cycle. Our page on the ex-dividend date covers that mechanism, the price adjustment it produces, and its role in the tax treatment of dividends in full; this page states only why settlement timing is what makes that whole sequence necessary in the first place.
A shorter settlement cycle reduces, without eliminating, the period during which a trade is agreed but not yet completed. For the length of that window, whichever cycle is in force, each side of the trade is relying on the clearing house's guarantee, described on our own page for the clearing house, that the other side's obligation will be honored when settlement day arrives. Shortening the cycle from two days to one shortens that window and the market risk that accumulates during it, which was part of the regulatory rationale for making the change; it does not remove the distinction between trade date and settlement date, only the length of the gap between them.
Margin accounts and cash accounts treat the settlement gap differently, and confusing the two produces the wrong expectation about what is allowed. In a margin account, a firm's willingness to extend credit against the account's own collateral generally lets an investor buy and sell before funds from a prior sale have settled, without the freeriding restriction that applies in a cash account, because the firm is extending credit rather than relying on unsettled cash. Our page on the margin account covers that borrowing relationship, and its own separate risks, in full; this page is only about what settlement timing means for a cash account specifically.