The daily reset and its compounding consequence are identical to a leveraged fund's, just pointed the other way. Because the fund's exposure is rebalanced back to the stated inverse multiple at the end of every trading day, its cumulative return over more than one day is not simply the opposite of the index's own cumulative return over that period. A choppy, volatile market, one that moves substantially in both directions without a clear trend, tends to erode an inverse fund's value over time in the same way it erodes a leveraged fund's, for the same reason: both are compounding a fixed daily percentage rather than tracking a fixed multiple of a longer-period return. Our page on the leveraged ETF works through a two-day numerical example of this decay; the mechanism there applies here with the sign flipped.
The narrow, legitimate use case is a short-term hedge, and it is worth being specific about what that means. An investor holding a concentrated stock position ahead of a known, near-term event, an earnings report or a court ruling, might buy an inverse fund on a broad index for a day or two as insurance against a broad market decline dragging the position down with it, intending to close the hedge quickly regardless of outcome. That is a materially different use from holding an inverse fund for weeks as a standing bet that a market is due to fall, which exposes the position to the same compounding drift that makes these products unsuitable for an extended hold, per FINRA's own conclusion, stated in identical terms for leveraged and inverse funds: they "typically are not suitable for retail investors who plan to hold them for more than one trading session, particularly in volatile markets."
An inverse fund is not the same thing as selling short, even though both profit from a decline, and conflating them misses a real practical difference. Short selling, covered on its own page, involves borrowing and selling a specific security, with a loss that has no arithmetic ceiling if the price keeps rising. Buying an inverse ETF instead uses the investor's own capital, purchased like any other share, with the loss capped at what was paid for the fund, because the fund itself, not the investor directly, is the one using derivatives to obtain the inverse exposure. The two accomplish a similar directional goal through very different mechanics and very different risk profiles for the person holding the position.
Nothing about the inverse label changes the fund's exposure to volatility itself. An inverse fund tracking a highly volatile underlying inherits that volatility, amplified by its stated multiple, on top of the daily-compounding drift described above. The combination of a volatile underlying and an inverse, leveraged structure is where the divergence between the fund's actual longer-period result and what an investor might naively expect from "the opposite of the index" tends to be largest.