Medicare's near-total exclusion of foreign care is the single most important fact here, because so many people assume the opposite. Medicare generally does not pay for health care received outside the United States and its territories. The exceptions are narrow and situational: an emergency in the United States where the nearest hospital that can treat the condition is across the border in Canada or Mexico; an emergency while traveling the most direct route through Canada between Alaska and another US state; a case where a foreign hospital is closer to a US home than the nearest US hospital that can treat the condition; and care aboard a ship within US territorial waters. Outside those situations, a retiree who moves abroad and keeps only Medicare has, in practical terms, no coverage where they live. Some Medicare Advantage plans and some employer retiree plans add limited foreign coverage, but original Medicare on its own does not travel.
Some Medigap policies fill a sliver of the gap, but only a sliver. Standardized Medigap plans that include the foreign-travel emergency benefit cover 80 percent of the cost of qualifying emergency care that begins during the first 60 days of a trip abroad, after a deductible and subject to a lifetime maximum. That is genuinely useful for a short emergency early in a trip, but the 60-day limit, the emergency-only scope, and the lifetime cap mean it is not a substitute for a real international plan for anyone spending extended time overseas.
Choosing between travel-medical and expatriate coverage is mostly about duration and what care is needed. Travel-medical policies are inexpensive and easy to buy per trip, but they cover emergencies rather than ongoing or pre-existing conditions and end when the trip does. Expatriate plans cost more and are underwritten more like ordinary health insurance, but they cover the routine, chronic, and preventive care a resident actually uses, and they do not lapse at the end of a trip. Medical evacuation coverage, which pays to transport a patient to adequate care or home, is a common and worthwhile feature of both, because an evacuation can cost more than the treatment itself.
The tax and mandate angle is narrower than it once was, but worth stating. The Affordable Care Act's individual "shared responsibility" requirement to carry minimum essential coverage is still on the books, but the federal penalty for not carrying it has been zero since 2019, so lacking US coverage while abroad no longer carries a federal tax cost. In addition, US citizens and residents who qualify as living abroad, broadly those who meet the foreign earned income exclusion's residence or presence tests, are treated as having minimum essential coverage for the months they qualify, so the requirement does not force an expatriate to buy a US plan they cannot use. A handful of states run their own coverage mandates, which is a separate question from federal law.