🔑 Uniform coverage is the feature that makes the arrangement worth having. The rule is that "the maximum amount of reimbursement from a health FSA must be available at all times during the period of coverage", reduced only by reimbursements already made for that period. It comes from the proposed regulations issued under section 125 in 2007, which have never been finalised; Treasury stated in the same document that taxpayers may rely on them pending final regulations, and plans follow them. So the entire annual election is available from the first day of the plan year, regardless of how little has been withheld so far. An employee who elects $2,000 and needs $2,000 of dental work in January can claim the full amount, and if they leave the employer in February the employer generally absorbs the difference rather than recovering it. The risk therefore runs in the employee's favour, which is the reverse of nearly every other pre-tax benefit and the reason the forfeiture rule exists as a counterweight. Note that the rule is written for health flexible spending accounts specifically: a dependent care arrangement reimburses only what has actually been contributed.
🔴 The election is locked harder than any other cafeteria-plan choice, and most explanations understate it. Treasury Regulation section 1.125-4(a) states two things that have to be read together: a plan "may permit an employee to revoke an election during a period of coverage and to make a new election only as provided" in the listed circumstances, and "section 125 does not require a cafeteria plan to permit any of these changes." So a permitted event is necessary and not sufficient, and the plan document has the last word. Beyond that, section 1.125-4(f)(1) provides that the significant cost or coverage change route "does not apply to an election change with respect to a health FSA." That route is what lets employees adjust other cafeteria benefits when their price or availability shifts mid-year, and it is closed to the health flexible spending account entirely. What remains are the change in status events, such as marriage, divorce, a birth or adoption, or a change in employment status, and even those must satisfy a consistency rule requiring the change to correspond with the event.
Forfeiture, and the two reliefs that are mutually exclusive. Money not spent by the end of the plan year is forfeited to the employer. An employer may soften that in one of two ways: a carryover of up to $680 of unused amounts into the next plan year, or a grace period of up to two and a half months after the plan year in which to incur further expenses. Publication 969 states the constraint plainly: a plan adopting a carryover provision is not permitted also to provide a grace period for health flexible spending accounts. A plan may offer one, or the other, or neither, and which applies is a question about your employer rather than about the law.
It is not an account and it is not yours. Despite the name, no separate account holds the money and nothing is invested; the arrangement is a promise by the employer to reimburse. It does not move with you between jobs, it cannot be carried into retirement, and Publication 969 states that self-employed persons are not eligible for one at all. That is the sharpest contrast with a health savings account, which Publication 969 calls "portable" and whose contributions "remain in your account until you use them." The two arrangements look similar on a benefits enrolment screen and behave nothing alike.
🔴 A general-purpose health flexible spending account disqualifies health savings account contributions. The reason is in the eligibility test at Internal Revenue Code section 223(c)(1)(A): you must not be covered by another health plan that fails the high deductible test and covers a benefit your qualifying plan covers. A general-purpose arrangement reimburses exactly those expenses, so it counts. A limited-purpose version, confined to categories such as dental and vision, does not, and neither does a post-deductible design. A spouse's general-purpose account can disqualify you as well, if it is able to reimburse your expenses, which is the version households most often miss.
The dependent care version is a different provision with different rules. It sits under section 129 rather than section 125(i), reimburses employment-related care rather than medical expenses, and its exclusion limit is a flat statutory $7,500, or $3,750 for a married person filing separately. That figure was raised from $5,000 for tax years beginning after 2025 and, unlike the health limit, it carries no inflation adjustment, so it will stay where it is until Congress moves it again.