How judgments in debt cases are actually entered. A creditor files suit, the defendant is served, and the defendant answers or does not. If no response is filed within the time the court's rules allow, the court may enter a default judgment: an award granted because the claim went uncontested rather than because a court weighed the evidence. A default judgment is a judgment. It supports the same enforcement tools, appears on the same records, and accrues interest the same way. Courts generally allow a defendant to move to set aside, or vacate, a default judgment, but the grounds and the deadlines are set by each court's own rules, and the window is usually short.
The federal protection nobody is told about, and it works without being asked for. 31 CFR part 212 governs what a bank must do when a garnishment order arrives on an account that has been receiving certain federal benefits by direct deposit. Its scope, at § 212.2(b), is benefit payments from the Social Security Administration, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Railroad Retirement Board and the Office of Personnel Management. The mechanics are these:
On being served, the bank must first examine the order for a Notice of Right to Garnish Federal Benefits (§ 212.4(a)). If one is attached, the bank follows its ordinary procedures and this protection does not apply. If none is attached, the bank must "perform an account review" no later than two business days after receiving the order and enough information to identify the account holder (§ 212.5(a)).
The review looks back over a lookback period, defined at § 212.3 as "the two month period that begins on the date preceding the date of account review and ends on the corresponding date of the month two months earlier". If a benefit payment posted in that window, the bank calculates a protected amount, defined as the lesser of the benefit payments posted during the lookback period and the balance in the account when the review is performed.
What the bank then does with that figure is the part that matters. Under § 212.6(a) it "shall ensure that the account holder has full and customary access to the protected amount, which the financial institution shall not freeze", and "An account holder shall have no requirement to assert any right of garnishment exemption prior to accessing the protected amount in the account." Section 212.6(c) adds that the protected amount "shall be conclusively considered to be exempt from garnishment under law." The review is performed "without consideration for any other attributes of the account or the garnishment order" (§ 212.5(d)), which expressly includes "The presence of other funds, from whatever source, that may be commingled in the account", a co-owner on the account, and the nature of the underlying debt. Section 212.6(f) and (g) make the review a one-time exercise and bar the bank from garnishing later deposits under the same order. Section 212.6(h) bars any garnishment fee against the protected amount.
Two limits the reader has to know, or the protection is overstated. First, "benefit payment" is defined at § 212.3 as a payment "paid by direct deposit to an account with the character 'XX' encoded in positions 54 and 55 of the Company Entry Description field" of the deposit entry. A benefit check deposited by hand does not carry that marker, so it is not automatically protected by this rule. Second, funds above the protected amount are handled under the bank's ordinary procedures (§ 212.6(d)), so anything beyond two months of benefits still requires the account holder to assert whatever exemption their state provides.
A judgment earns interest, and in federal court the rate is a formula rather than a number. 28 USC 1961(a) provides that interest on a money judgment in a district court runs "from the date of the entry of the judgment, at a rate equal to the weekly average 1-year constant maturity Treasury yield, as published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, for the calendar week preceding" the date of the judgment. Subsection (b) requires it to be "computed daily to the date of payment" and "compounded annually." That rate moves with the Treasury market, so no figure is printed here. State courts set their own post-judgment rates by statute, and those differ sharply. And 1961(c)(1) carves out internal revenue tax cases, routing them to the underpayment or overpayment rate under Internal Revenue Code section 6621 instead.
The credit-reporting clock for a judgment has no fixed end, and the reason is in the statute's wording. 15 USC 1681c(a)(2) restricts reporting of civil judgments that "from date of entry, antedate the report by more than seven years or until the governing statute of limitations has expired, whichever is the longer period." That final clause is the departure from the seven-year pattern: where a state's limitations period for enforcing a judgment is longer, the longer period governs. Other items have fixed ceilings, including the ten years 1681c(a)(1) allows for a bankruptcy, and a charged-off account is handled under (a)(4) with the start-date rule at (c)(1). Published material on credit reports carries the full table.
What the statute permits and what the bureaus do have diverged. Published material on tax liens records the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's finding that the three nationwide consumer reporting agencies removed civil public records under the National Consumer Assistance Plan, so that bankruptcies became the only public record on their reports. A civil judgment can still be lawfully reported for longer than seven years, and it can still be sold to lenders by other reporting agencies and found as a public record at the courthouse. It is the nationwide bureaus' own reports it has largely left.
What the creditor can do with the judgment, in outline. The standard post-judgment tools are wage garnishment, attaching funds in a bank account, and recording the judgment so that it becomes a lien on real property the debtor owns in that county. Published material covers each: wage garnishment has its own page and its own procedure, federal law caps ordinary wage garnishment at the lesser of 25 percent of disposable earnings or the amount above thirty times the federal minimum hourly wage, and liens have their own page. How long the judgment remains enforceable, whether it can be renewed before it lapses, and which property is exempt from execution are state-law questions with genuinely different answers from state to state, and this page does not give a national figure for any of them.