The two conditions are conjunctive, and the rule's own commentary says so in terms. The Official Interpretation of 12 CFR 1041.3(d)(5) is headed "Lender possession required and no recourse permitted" and states that "A pawn loan must satisfy two conditions to be excluded." On the first: "the lender must have sole physical possession and use of the property securing the pawned property at all times during the entire term of the loan. If the consumer retains either possession or use of the property, however limited the consumer's possession or use of the property might be, the loan is not excluded." On the second: "the lender must have no recourse if the consumer does not elect to redeem the pawned item and repay the loan other than retaining the pawned property to dispose of according to State or local law."
The commentary then closes the obvious workaround, and in doing so states the clearest consumer fact on this page. It continues: "If any consumer, or if any co-signor, guarantor, or similar person, is personally liable for the difference between the outstanding balance on the loan and the value of the pawned property, the loan is not excluded from the requirements of this part." The difference between the balance and the value of the collateral is what other secured lending calls a deficiency balance. A genuine pawn loan cannot produce one, from the borrower or from anyone who signed alongside them.
What that means in practice is unusual enough to be worth stating plainly. On almost every other secured consumer loan, losing the collateral is the beginning of the problem rather than the end of it: the item is sold, the proceeds fall short, and the borrower still owes the difference. On a non-recourse pawn loan the borrower's entire exposure is the item. If they do not come back for it, they lose it and owe nothing. There is nothing for a collector to buy, nothing to sue on, and nothing to report.
The price of that is paid up front, in the gap between what the item is worth and what is lent against it. A lender whose only remedy is the item will lend well below its resale value, and the value the borrower gives up by not redeeming is not limited to the loan. It is the whole item.
The word "pawn" on a storefront does not tell a customer which product they are in. A transaction marketed as a title pawn, where the borrower keeps and drives the vehicle, fails the possession condition outright, and if the borrower remains liable for a shortfall it fails the recourse condition as well. Failing either one means the transaction is not the excluded product and can be a covered loan under the payday rule. Published material on auto title loans covers that structure. The practical question for a borrower is not what the sign says but whether they are walking out with the item or with a debt.