The most useful application of book value is comparative, through the price-to-book ratio: the share price divided by book value per share. A ratio below 1 means the market values the company at less than its recorded net assets, which can flag a genuine bargain or a market judgment that the assets are worth less than the books claim. A high ratio means the market is paying a large premium over recorded net worth, usually because it expects the company to earn far more than its assets alone would suggest. Value investors have long used a low price-to-book ratio as one screen for cheap stocks, and it is one of the measures behind the value factor in factor investing.
Book value works far better for some kinds of company than others, and the reason is what accounting does and does not record. For a bank, an insurer, or a capital-heavy manufacturer, whose value largely resides in tangible, financial assets carried near their real worth, book value is a meaningful anchor. For an asset-light company, whose value lives in brands, patents, software, network effects, or the skills of its people, book value is nearly useless, because accounting records purchased intangibles inconsistently and internally built ones barely at all. A software firm can be enormously valuable with almost no book value, producing a sky-high price-to-book ratio that reflects a limitation of the measure rather than an overpriced stock. This is the central caution: book value understates the worth of exactly the businesses that dominate modern markets.
A few finer points round out an honest reading. Book value can even go negative, when accumulated losses or large buybacks push liabilities and treasury stock past assets, which does not necessarily mean the company is failing. Share buybacks reduce both cash and equity, lowering book value per share. And "tangible book value," which strips out goodwill and other intangibles, is often used for financial companies to get a cleaner figure. In every case book value is a floor-ish accounting reference point, most informative when read alongside earnings-based measures rather than on its own.